"A blog is to a writer what a canvas is to an artist." ~ Colleen Redman

If Robots Wrote Poetry

I.
They would sell you a bridge
from a copy machine altar
where God is an avatar
and the world is flat

They would bargain with the devil
Sell you a wind-up nightingale
A parlor trick gimmick
of soulless semantics

Until you no longer knew the difference
between Muzak and Mozart
between sentient creation
and automated content

II.

Let the billionaires share
what never was theirs
Let robots cure cancer
and climate change
But don’t let them claim
or plagiarize the artists
Don’t let poets become
the jukebox nostalgics

__________Colleen Redman / Poets and Storytellers United / dVerse Poets Pub

17 Responses | Add your Own

  • 1 Linda Lee Lyberg:

    I love this, and indeed, there are some things we should leave be.

  • 2 Dwight L. Roth:

    I really love this Colleen! And a big Amen for not losing who we are to AI.

  • 3 Ron. Lavalette:

    I may let my robot do ALL the work from here on in…NOT!

  • 4 msjadeli:

    AMEN

  • 5 Penelope Notes:

    Jukebox nostalgics … well described of so many things that have come and almost gone. AI is definitely something to monitor. In art or prose I suppose it can perform as somewhat of a prompt, taking from everything humanity has already inputted into its big “mechanical” brain. But it has no heart and its nuance is doubtful. So hopefully, there will always be a role for us organics. :))

  • 6 Grace:

    In the future it may be hard to spot the difference between the work by a human vs a robot. But for now, the robot’s work is just automated content.

  • 7 Rajani:

    I think the boundaries in digital art and music are already blurring… poetry may take a little more time. But now that the genie is out… it’s not going to stop…sigh!

  • 8 Rosemary Nissen-Wade:

    Wonderful! And dovetails with some of my thinking, which I’ll be including in my next P&SU hosting. I might even quote you, this is so much on topic.

  • 9 Kim M. Russell:

    We had a prompt at dVerse in which we tried writing poems using AI, and the overall consensus was that it wasn’t much good. Your poem has confirmed that, Colleen, with the ‘parlor trick gimmick / of soulless semantics’ and the thought that we would no longer know ‘the difference between Muzak and Mozart’. Yes! ‘Let robots cure cancer / and climate change’ but ‘Don’t let poets become / the jukebox nostalgics’.

  • 10 Jim:

    This is super!! Two things:
    1. Look up here’s “Muzak”; and
    2. On the line, “…the devil Sell you a wind-up nightingale”, compare his toy nightingale with my battery operated toy elephant and toy dummy singing pair, blog visitors quite often.
    3. There could be other items but this is ’nuff for now.
    ..

  • 11 Magaly Guerrero:

    So mote it be!

    Some things can be put in the hands of the machine. But others–often the most important ones–must be handled with soul.

  • 12 Helen:

    Beautifully penned poem, Colleen. ChatGPT is the enemy.

  • 13 dsnake1:

    There are so many AI generated content out there, that it’s hard to tell what is true or false. AI can write a poem, I have asked ChatGPT to do that, but it still seems to lack something, it’s ability to write ” wow” imagery. Perhaps one day, when it read enough of the great masters.

  • 14 Geetashree Chatterjee:

    I am with you your thoughts

  • 15 Jewish Young Professional "JYP":

    Every line is a knockout – I enjoyed this

  • 16 rogblog666:

    agreed AI is scary i enjoyed your poem.

  • 17 Sherry:

    Right on point!!
    I agree with all these comments – I’m 3 years late !

Leave a reply

Required

Required, hidden

XHTML Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>